Editorial: Insurance
Proposed reforms could
ease burden on home, vehicle owners
The Register-Herald,
It's going to take
more than talk to solve the mounting insurance woes in
Residents disgruntled with premiums that nearly doubled
within one year and discouraged with no hope in sight expressed their concerns.
Lawmakers agreed there's a problem and blamed the state's
insurance laws and court decisions that result in high payouts for insurers.
Representatives of insurance companies spoke about a
dwindling insurance market that creates an additional cause of high premiums
because of a lack of healthy competition. Insurers can drop clients for no
reason other than they no longer want to do business with them.
It's no longer profitable to write policies in
Two proposed laws under consideration by legislators
could offer some relief. One limits when insurers
can refuse to renew home and auto policies. This would be especially helpful for
policyholders who do not file frequent claims, but have been dropped by their
insurer anyway. The second favors the face value
of a policy over the replacement value of the property insured. In
Although lawmakers initiated some civil justice reforms
in 2003 as a response to malpractice insurance concerns that were similar to
those faced by home and vehicle owners, the consensus of this group is that more
reforms are needed.
Whatever the cause, or causes, of the problem, it's clear
that rising rates are not good for
It's a problem that must be fixed. Influential parties
need to keep talking to legislators, and lawmakers need to listen -- and act
responsibly -- on what they hear.