Pension Funding Turns To General Revenue
Defeat of bond proposal means money will come from budgetThe Associated Press, June 27, 2005
As debate continues nationally
over the future of underfunded retirement programs for public employees,
A Saturday special election saw
voters reject, by 54 percent to 46 percent, a plan to provide ailing pension
funds for teachers, judges and troopers with up to $5.5 billion from the sale of
bonds. The election, which sought to amend the state’s constitutional ban on
taking on debt, is not expected to deter other state and local governments as
they examine whether to shore up pension plans by issuing bonds.
“Quite a few states have
pension bonds,” said Jason Dickerson, senior director at Fitch Ratings. “In
many cases, state and local governments don’t need local approval. I don’t
know that it [the election] would affect state or local governments.” But the
defeat leaves
“We were hoping that we would
be able to get better control over how much the state was going to have to pay
each year,” said Judy Hale, president of the American Federation of
Teachers-West Virginia, which supported the bond plan. “This just means there
will be less money for other things as those payments increase.”
The funding shortfall for the
teachers’ program, which has 45,363 enrollees, is one of the worst among
public plans nationwide. Responsible for about $5 billion of
A number of state and local
governments also face hard choices. The 127 state and local plans tracked by the
National Association of State Retirement Administrators suffer from a combined
shortfall of $279 billion. For
While
Manchin had promised savings of
$1.5 billion to $3 billion for the bond plan by investing the bond proceeds. The
savings — generated by locking in annual payments of $350 million over 30
years — would be used to create jobs and expand the state’s economy, he
said.
The governor now says he wants
to move on to other issues and will leave the pension problem to future
governors and legislatures.
But closing pension funding gaps
is only part of the problem facing
Manchin had lawmakers pass an
array of pension-tightening measures earlier this year. Among their provisions,
the legislation mandates that any benefit increase be fully funded within six
years.
Saturday’s failed vote marks
the first major policy defeat for Manchin since he took office in January. A
former lawmaker and secretary of state, the 57-year-old Democrat had enjoyed a
string of successes tackling West Virginia’s auto insurance rates, workers’
compensation debts and other issues. A SurveyUSA poll of approval ratings
conducted in May ranked him the sixth-most-popular governor in the nation, and
the second-most-popular Democratic governor.
But Manchin and a coalition
formed to promote the bond sale didn’t begin seriously stumping until about
two weeks before the election.
The Vote Yes for
The election’s outcome raises
the political profile of the plan’s loudest critic, Massey Energy Co. CEO and
Chairman Don Blankenship. Blankenship spent several hundred thousand dollars on
a series of radio and television ads and automated phone calls that decried the
stock market risks and fees earmarked for “lawyers and bankers.”
Blankenship waded into
Blankenship had previously
sparred with Manchin after the governor persuaded lawmakers to raise the
severance tax on coal. With subsidiaries that employ more than 3,000